Showing posts with label elm street. Show all posts
Showing posts with label elm street. Show all posts

Wednesday, August 30, 2017

The Greatest Horror Movie Ever Made: The Case For THE TEXAS CHAIN SAW MASSACRE

In honor of the passing of legendary director TOBE HOOPER, we are presenting a chapter from the book THE GREATEST HORROR MOVIE EVER MADE. Author and Rue Morgue columnist Paul Counelis makes the case for Hooper's magnum opus as the best horror movie of all time.


Tobe Hooper 1943 -2017

                            THE TEXAS CHAIN SAW MASSACRE (1974) Director: TOBE HOOPER

     The first time I saw The Texas Chain Saw Massacre, I was 15 years old. I hadn’t seen a TON of really dark horror films at that point; I had seen A Nightmare on Elm Street as well as most of the Universal Monsters stuff (which I was obsessed with at the time). I had no idea what to expect. To be honest, I thought it was going to be a campy B movie.

     I was wrong. To put it mildly.

     By now, most people who would really call themselves horror “fans” have seen the original ‘TCM’, and are aware of how visceral and realistic it feels. Simply put, it accomplishes that rare feat that very few horror films have. It almost seems like a documentary, like we as viewers are just flies on the wall, uncomfortably observing this maddeningly matter of fact group of cannibal hillbillies chasing a group of lost young people around their “farm”.

     Because so many are WELL aware of the Texas Chain Saw mythology at this point, I will not spend too much time talking about how little blood or gore are actually shown in the film, but its notable that the movie is remembered as being so brutal decades later. The most disturbing things captured by the eye of the camera are the bizarre moments that the family is engaged in, such as having to help their seemingly decaying grandfather hold a hammer so that he can try to hit a victim with it. Bizarre stuff that stays with you.

     Even with A Nightmare on Elm Street pretty fresh in my young mind, I really was NOT prepared for the aural onslaught that is The Texas Chain Saw Massacre

     Context is needed. My uncle and I had been renting films that were generally highly regarded but that neither of us had seen. This was pretty much our only criteria when we walked into the video store for the week’s selection. Our first few viewings consisted of such eye opening cinema as The Godfather, One Flew over the Cuckoo’s Nest and Close Encounters. To be sure, it was a priceless education for a teen who was pretty much a card carrying member of the church of Star Wars. I had seen plenty of good films, the early Karloff Frankenstein films for instance, but they weren’t super challenging in the most emotional ways like some of these films were.

     I feel like something changed inside me when the opening reel of The Texas Chain Saw Massacre flickered across my Uncle Tony’s TV screen. Don’t worry, it was in a good way.

     I sat in enrapt silence and with a more than a few sideways glances to see how Uncle Tony was faring with his own viewing experience. He seemed to be just as engrossed as I was watching Leatherface and his family act like maniacs to this unsuspecting group of city kids.

     Made for just over $80,000 in 1974, TCM marked the first time that I looked at a film and really realized, hey, someone MADE this. They wrote their simple story, got some people to play the parts, went out into a big house and just made their movie. I remember feeling like there was no way it should be as “good” as it was. Clearly, these were not seasoned actors with super expensive equipment and a big studio budget.

     It was the first time I thought, “I want to make a movie. And I CAN.”

     I’m sure that same realization happened to countless hordes of other TCM viewers over the years. The movie is a standing testament to the creativity and drive of its filmmakers and the actors and actresses who braved what was by all accounts a truly dreadful shoot.

     Heck, the shoot itself may have contributed to the grimy realism of the film. By now, the legendary stories of the smells, fatigue and the heat surrounding those folks while they were making the movie have made their rounds umpteen times via interviews and special features on the many home video releases. Suffice to say that some of the craziness we see captured on film was about as close to real as it gets without actually being real.

     Director Tobe Hooper has often recounted stories of how much the cast and crew resented him during the shoot. The movie they came out with suggests that their efforts were not in vain.
To call The Texas Chain Saw Massacre influential is almost an insult to the word “influential”. For dozens of horror filmmakers to come, TCM is less a film than it is a template for a certain type of aesthetic that has come to be associated with the movie and others like it.

     One so obviously influenced dude is Rob Zombie, who has seemingly made a cinematic career out of letting the TCM philosophy guide his work. The results have been mixed, but Zombie’s films have an undeniable grit that they largely owe to the TCM influence.

     It’s also fair to point out some of the TCM acting performances, which vary in terms of thespian quality, but which are absolutely indispensable to the film’s memorable imagery. In particular, the late Marilyn Burns is effective as Sally Hardesty, screaming and crying her way through the film’s seemingly prolonged climax in an excruciatingly realistic and primal state of fear and hysteria. Theories again abound that part of the realism of her performance was due to the conditions on set.

      Burns (decades old SPOILER ALERT, for pete’s sake) helped to establish an eventual major slasher film trope with her character surviving the film as a “final girl”, though she is definitely kind of just more lucky than Nancy or Laurie or Sidney, who are all kind of proactive in their survival. But give Sally credit…she keeps movin’ and keeps screamin’ until the very moment she laughs in relieved maniac manner, climbing into a random escape vehicle while Leatherface swings his chainsaw around like a frustrated dancer in a doomed ballet.

     Of course, Leatherface is another solid “pro” when keeping tabs on the TCM legacy. Gunnar Hansen helped to bring life to an enduring horror icon, playing Hooper and co-writer Kim Henkel’s hulking “Ed Gein” inspired madman. Hansen is a big reason why the film is so memorable, truth be told. He hits the right notes with his body language and the way he inhabits the face(s) mask(s). And he really is asked to do quite a bit in terms of selling the terror.

     One of the most jarring and sinister scenes occurs when Leatherface appears behind some poor fool, bops him on the head, drags him into a room and abruptly slams the door. That is a moment where we as an audience think, “Ok. I kind of don’t want to know what is going to happen behind that door. But I have to.”

     Wes Craven often cited The Texas Chain Saw Massacre as one of the best examples of watching a film that may have been directed by a madman. Craven knew of which he spoke; his own Last House on the Left still stands as one of the most controversial films ever made. It was the type of ’dangerous’ filmmaking that got both films immediately banned upon release.
   
     In multiple countries.

     For years.

     As is the case with so many immortal horror films, The Texas Chain Saw Massacre could also be held up as a reflection of the time of its release. Hooper claims that so much of the nature of the film is due to the government scandals and multiple wars of the era, where brutality and a lack of empathy were becoming the social norm. Leatherface and his loving family were characterized responses to that growing displeasure.

     One aspect of this movie which can’t be downplayed is the “score”, as it were. It is EXTREMELY important, though perhaps not in the way that the scores of films like Halloween and A Nightmare on Elm Street are. That’s because TCM features a slew of ghoulish and freaky sounds, drenched in echo and delay, often piled each atop the other like a sonic wall of brick and mortar. It is used to highly disconcerting effect. There is no escape from it within the confines of a given scene.

     Again, Roger Ebert heaped praise upon a horror film even while damning it. He grouped it with Night of the Living Dead because of its technical success, while also commenting on the negative content. He said that both films were “better than they had to be.” Which is true in the context of what he saw as B horror films created by fledgling filmmakers with no other outlets aside from horror to make movies. But it is decidedly NOT true for the millions of people who still consistently turn to those films for a good, roller coaster-like scare on a dark night. They do have to be that good.

     Which brings us to another important point…The Texas Chain Saw Massacre is scary.
    
     As with any and all horror films, the scare factor is a matter of opinion and specific to each viewer. A seasoned horror fan is just not going to be easy to scare. But when someone who is not a veteran of horror watches TCM, to this day, they are likely to be disturbed. Often, even terrified.
This is because TCM gets SO much right in terms of setting everything up. This might be due to director Hooper’s background as a documentary cameraman. Camera placement is extremely important to the success of the film’s realism, and the decisions Hooper makes put us in situations that feel claustrophobic and tense. As with Carpenter’s Halloween, an unusual number of daytime shots are initially used to set a mood, as well as adding to the desperation of being stranded with the psychotic family when night falls.

     There is really no way to overstate the importance of The Texas Chain Saw Massacre to the horror genre. Fans as varied as Ridley Scott (who claims the movie as an influence on his own amazing film Alien) and horror writing legend Stephen King defend the film as an important cultural phenomenon, and contemporaries like Carpenter and Craven (the latter of which humorously compared Hooper to Manson after seeing the film) have routinely named it as one of the most effective horror films they have ever seen.

     There is a film made before TCM that was also inspired by the Ed Gein story. It is director Alfred Hitchcock’s seminal grandfather of the slasher movie, Psycho. John McCarty, author of several excellent books covering horror directors and films, once remarked that TCM made the hotel in Psycho seem “pleasant” in comparison.

     Simply put, The Texas Chain Saw Massacre is a full on nightmare, worthy of its legendary status, and a legit contender for the title of the greatest horror film of all time.

                                               
Leatherface, "A frustrated dancer in a doomed ballet."



You can read the rest of  Paul Counelis' book THE GREATEST HORROR MOVIE EVER MADE, available now at Lulu.com, Amazon.com or Barnes & Noble

Friday, February 26, 2016

A Horror Fan's Defense of THE WITCH (even though it doesn't NEED it)


By now, most die-hard fans of horror movies have heard about THE WITCH, if not seen it. Of those fans, most have formed an opinion (even some who haven't seen it, but who are going in with preconceived notions or bias based on the perception of hype). First off, let's get it out of the way right at the top...that's not a fair way to judge a film - how many people involved with horror like the movie, or how many creative ways Stephen King found to say "it's scary". Pretty much completely irrelevant aside from marketing.

But...because this has now sorta become one of the main issues of horror over the past several years (based on the success of "art house" horror like the masterpiece The Babadook and the extremely interesting and unique It Follows), and with so many horror fans citing "It didn't live up to the hype" as a "reason" to dislike what are AT THE VERY LEAST films whose ideas and settings have not been regurgitated ad nauseum, let's just agree to disagree on that point (that is, IF we disagree...if we agree, just nod your head in satisfaction).

See, here's the thing that these folks might not have considered: there is a CHANCE that casual fans of horror will actually enjoy this film...and that's because
A) They aren't hardened to the "scares" by years of watching virtually hundreds of horror movies of all types, and
B) They likely haven't been waiting the months it took for The Witch to go from festival favorite to mainstream theater.

For people who generally or mostly enjoy films of other genres aside from horror, the pace of The Witch will not seem unusual. The time spent establishing the environment and the way the characters interact will not be all that radical. The most crucial aspect of The Witch, in my opinion, is the atmosphere and the way first time (!) filmmaker  Robert Eggers allows the New England family of the 1630s to feel completely and wholly enveloped in a cocoon of claustrophobic proportions, and with no viable means to escape. That in itself is pretty impressive, in an era where having a damn cell phone in a horror movie has to be explained right away in order to allow the next events to unfold in an effective manner.

There will be a few spoilers in the coming paragraphs, so if you haven't yet seen The Witch, please bookmark this article, run to the theater, then come back and finish reading.

Done? Ok. Here goes.

Let me just be blunt: first off, you have never seen another movie quite like The Witch. Just admit it. Don't try to give a list of historical or cult inspired flicks and pretend they are like The Witch. They aren't. Not really. Much in the same way that no other film REALLY resembles The Babadook or It Follows. That does not mean you have to LIKE those films, of course, or ignore what you consider to be flaws, but let's acknowledge that these filmmakers at least tried to give us something we have never seen before. With that established (come on, stop mumbling or dreaming up a response for the comments section and roll with it here), let's explore that point a tiny bit further with a bit of a caveat: BUDGET.

The estimated production budget of The Witch is between 1 and 2 million dollars; $3.5 total. That's a lot of money to most people (aside from Donald Trump, who considers it a "small loan"), but in the world of mainstream film, that aint much. Let's look at what some comparative budgets in the horror world have given us:

THE UNBORN - $15 Million
THE FOG (2005) - $14 million
HOUSE OF WAX (2005) - $30 Million
DREAMCATCHER - $68 Million (really)
EXORCIST 2: THE HERETIC - $14 million (in 1977, no less)

You get the idea. There are dozens - DOZENS - more examples just like those. Now, I don't want to pick on those specific films, and that's not to say I didn't enjoy anything about those films (ok, except Exorcist II; even God dislikes that movie), but let's be realistic here...The Witch was made for a fraction of that, and again, even if you think you HATE the movie, its instantly more memorable than any number of these generic larger budget films. That's partially because they tried to craft a movie based on more than just effects or dimly executed jump scares with loud musical cues.

Thinking back to the very first complaint that many horror folks have leveled at this super interesting, dark folk tale, "It didn't live up to the hype," it now seems ULTRA silly, because the hype was caused by people who saw this movie in previews and festivals and couldn't believe that a movie that cost a couple million to make could be SO effective, could get SO far under their skin, that they could still be thinking about it months after their initial viewing. That's a triumph for a low budget horror film from a first time (!) feature director.

In comparison, a flat out genre phenom that crossed over is presented here for your consideration: Sharknado. That's right, the first installment of that SyFy mega-hit was made for near the same budget of The Witch. Can we acknowledge the unlikelihood that Robert Eggers was able to make a really dark, somewhat disturbing, image laden story for less than the amount of money that the ghastly CGI-informed, irrepressibly silly Sharknado cost? That's pretty crazy. If you don't believe me, give it a try yourself (that's right, I just played the "Could you make a movie better than that for that price?" card).

This is not a review of The Witch, though I suspect that at some point, I will have to delve into a much longer exploration of this bizarre film that has thoroughly intrigued me and gotten under my skin with its paranoiac themes, maybe even warranting its own volume. I watched the climactic moment of The Witch with a kind of giddy glee, a super and unexpected payoff for my patience through that seething, nightmarish ditty.

No, this is just a call to my friends and brothers-and-sisters-in-arms of horror who ceaselessly downgrade movies like The Witch, The Babadook and It Follows unfairly to reconsider before you rattle off stuff like "I believed the hype" or the even more questionable "It's not scary".

Let me ask you this, then...so what? Do horror movies really "scare" you when you've been consuming nearly every release for the past few decades? I know we all WISH that every movie had the impact of the first time we saw Halloween or A Nightmare On Elm Street, but that just ain't gonna happen...partially because that already happened, years ago when you saw those first movies.

Now, instead, its time to appreciate the creativity and cinematic triumph that some of these low budget horror directors exhibit when they try so hard to craft something of worth for us with less money than many 90 second car commercials cost. You have to put it in perspective. It's a minor MIRACLE that these movies are somehow finding their way into mainstream theaters...you should AT LEAST celebrate that fact. Look, its fair to plunk down your 8 bucks to see The Witch and then decide you didn't like the film. I have no qualms with that.

But if you're a realist, you will at least have to admit that, hey, that was one hell of a good try. Good on you, Mr. Eggers. That was a super ambitious undertaking for a couple million bucks. Or, you can just flip over on your TV remote and watch Sharknado 4, whose ad campaign lets you decide whether or not the main character of Sharknado 3: Oh Hell No lives or dies.

And if you choose that film over a shadowy, diabolical study of unhinged delusion and paranoia that takes place in inescapable thickets and groves under the watchful eye of the halcyon moon, well, not to be a snob, but I guess you sorta get what you deserve.
 

Wouldst thou like to live deliciously? I will guide thy hand.