Showing posts with label john carpenter. Show all posts
Showing posts with label john carpenter. Show all posts

Wednesday, August 30, 2017

The Greatest Horror Movie Ever Made: The Case For THE TEXAS CHAIN SAW MASSACRE

In honor of the passing of legendary director TOBE HOOPER, we are presenting a chapter from the book THE GREATEST HORROR MOVIE EVER MADE. Author and Rue Morgue columnist Paul Counelis makes the case for Hooper's magnum opus as the best horror movie of all time.


Tobe Hooper 1943 -2017

                            THE TEXAS CHAIN SAW MASSACRE (1974) Director: TOBE HOOPER

     The first time I saw The Texas Chain Saw Massacre, I was 15 years old. I hadn’t seen a TON of really dark horror films at that point; I had seen A Nightmare on Elm Street as well as most of the Universal Monsters stuff (which I was obsessed with at the time). I had no idea what to expect. To be honest, I thought it was going to be a campy B movie.

     I was wrong. To put it mildly.

     By now, most people who would really call themselves horror “fans” have seen the original ‘TCM’, and are aware of how visceral and realistic it feels. Simply put, it accomplishes that rare feat that very few horror films have. It almost seems like a documentary, like we as viewers are just flies on the wall, uncomfortably observing this maddeningly matter of fact group of cannibal hillbillies chasing a group of lost young people around their “farm”.

     Because so many are WELL aware of the Texas Chain Saw mythology at this point, I will not spend too much time talking about how little blood or gore are actually shown in the film, but its notable that the movie is remembered as being so brutal decades later. The most disturbing things captured by the eye of the camera are the bizarre moments that the family is engaged in, such as having to help their seemingly decaying grandfather hold a hammer so that he can try to hit a victim with it. Bizarre stuff that stays with you.

     Even with A Nightmare on Elm Street pretty fresh in my young mind, I really was NOT prepared for the aural onslaught that is The Texas Chain Saw Massacre

     Context is needed. My uncle and I had been renting films that were generally highly regarded but that neither of us had seen. This was pretty much our only criteria when we walked into the video store for the week’s selection. Our first few viewings consisted of such eye opening cinema as The Godfather, One Flew over the Cuckoo’s Nest and Close Encounters. To be sure, it was a priceless education for a teen who was pretty much a card carrying member of the church of Star Wars. I had seen plenty of good films, the early Karloff Frankenstein films for instance, but they weren’t super challenging in the most emotional ways like some of these films were.

     I feel like something changed inside me when the opening reel of The Texas Chain Saw Massacre flickered across my Uncle Tony’s TV screen. Don’t worry, it was in a good way.

     I sat in enrapt silence and with a more than a few sideways glances to see how Uncle Tony was faring with his own viewing experience. He seemed to be just as engrossed as I was watching Leatherface and his family act like maniacs to this unsuspecting group of city kids.

     Made for just over $80,000 in 1974, TCM marked the first time that I looked at a film and really realized, hey, someone MADE this. They wrote their simple story, got some people to play the parts, went out into a big house and just made their movie. I remember feeling like there was no way it should be as “good” as it was. Clearly, these were not seasoned actors with super expensive equipment and a big studio budget.

     It was the first time I thought, “I want to make a movie. And I CAN.”

     I’m sure that same realization happened to countless hordes of other TCM viewers over the years. The movie is a standing testament to the creativity and drive of its filmmakers and the actors and actresses who braved what was by all accounts a truly dreadful shoot.

     Heck, the shoot itself may have contributed to the grimy realism of the film. By now, the legendary stories of the smells, fatigue and the heat surrounding those folks while they were making the movie have made their rounds umpteen times via interviews and special features on the many home video releases. Suffice to say that some of the craziness we see captured on film was about as close to real as it gets without actually being real.

     Director Tobe Hooper has often recounted stories of how much the cast and crew resented him during the shoot. The movie they came out with suggests that their efforts were not in vain.
To call The Texas Chain Saw Massacre influential is almost an insult to the word “influential”. For dozens of horror filmmakers to come, TCM is less a film than it is a template for a certain type of aesthetic that has come to be associated with the movie and others like it.

     One so obviously influenced dude is Rob Zombie, who has seemingly made a cinematic career out of letting the TCM philosophy guide his work. The results have been mixed, but Zombie’s films have an undeniable grit that they largely owe to the TCM influence.

     It’s also fair to point out some of the TCM acting performances, which vary in terms of thespian quality, but which are absolutely indispensable to the film’s memorable imagery. In particular, the late Marilyn Burns is effective as Sally Hardesty, screaming and crying her way through the film’s seemingly prolonged climax in an excruciatingly realistic and primal state of fear and hysteria. Theories again abound that part of the realism of her performance was due to the conditions on set.

      Burns (decades old SPOILER ALERT, for pete’s sake) helped to establish an eventual major slasher film trope with her character surviving the film as a “final girl”, though she is definitely kind of just more lucky than Nancy or Laurie or Sidney, who are all kind of proactive in their survival. But give Sally credit…she keeps movin’ and keeps screamin’ until the very moment she laughs in relieved maniac manner, climbing into a random escape vehicle while Leatherface swings his chainsaw around like a frustrated dancer in a doomed ballet.

     Of course, Leatherface is another solid “pro” when keeping tabs on the TCM legacy. Gunnar Hansen helped to bring life to an enduring horror icon, playing Hooper and co-writer Kim Henkel’s hulking “Ed Gein” inspired madman. Hansen is a big reason why the film is so memorable, truth be told. He hits the right notes with his body language and the way he inhabits the face(s) mask(s). And he really is asked to do quite a bit in terms of selling the terror.

     One of the most jarring and sinister scenes occurs when Leatherface appears behind some poor fool, bops him on the head, drags him into a room and abruptly slams the door. That is a moment where we as an audience think, “Ok. I kind of don’t want to know what is going to happen behind that door. But I have to.”

     Wes Craven often cited The Texas Chain Saw Massacre as one of the best examples of watching a film that may have been directed by a madman. Craven knew of which he spoke; his own Last House on the Left still stands as one of the most controversial films ever made. It was the type of ’dangerous’ filmmaking that got both films immediately banned upon release.
   
     In multiple countries.

     For years.

     As is the case with so many immortal horror films, The Texas Chain Saw Massacre could also be held up as a reflection of the time of its release. Hooper claims that so much of the nature of the film is due to the government scandals and multiple wars of the era, where brutality and a lack of empathy were becoming the social norm. Leatherface and his loving family were characterized responses to that growing displeasure.

     One aspect of this movie which can’t be downplayed is the “score”, as it were. It is EXTREMELY important, though perhaps not in the way that the scores of films like Halloween and A Nightmare on Elm Street are. That’s because TCM features a slew of ghoulish and freaky sounds, drenched in echo and delay, often piled each atop the other like a sonic wall of brick and mortar. It is used to highly disconcerting effect. There is no escape from it within the confines of a given scene.

     Again, Roger Ebert heaped praise upon a horror film even while damning it. He grouped it with Night of the Living Dead because of its technical success, while also commenting on the negative content. He said that both films were “better than they had to be.” Which is true in the context of what he saw as B horror films created by fledgling filmmakers with no other outlets aside from horror to make movies. But it is decidedly NOT true for the millions of people who still consistently turn to those films for a good, roller coaster-like scare on a dark night. They do have to be that good.

     Which brings us to another important point…The Texas Chain Saw Massacre is scary.
    
     As with any and all horror films, the scare factor is a matter of opinion and specific to each viewer. A seasoned horror fan is just not going to be easy to scare. But when someone who is not a veteran of horror watches TCM, to this day, they are likely to be disturbed. Often, even terrified.
This is because TCM gets SO much right in terms of setting everything up. This might be due to director Hooper’s background as a documentary cameraman. Camera placement is extremely important to the success of the film’s realism, and the decisions Hooper makes put us in situations that feel claustrophobic and tense. As with Carpenter’s Halloween, an unusual number of daytime shots are initially used to set a mood, as well as adding to the desperation of being stranded with the psychotic family when night falls.

     There is really no way to overstate the importance of The Texas Chain Saw Massacre to the horror genre. Fans as varied as Ridley Scott (who claims the movie as an influence on his own amazing film Alien) and horror writing legend Stephen King defend the film as an important cultural phenomenon, and contemporaries like Carpenter and Craven (the latter of which humorously compared Hooper to Manson after seeing the film) have routinely named it as one of the most effective horror films they have ever seen.

     There is a film made before TCM that was also inspired by the Ed Gein story. It is director Alfred Hitchcock’s seminal grandfather of the slasher movie, Psycho. John McCarty, author of several excellent books covering horror directors and films, once remarked that TCM made the hotel in Psycho seem “pleasant” in comparison.

     Simply put, The Texas Chain Saw Massacre is a full on nightmare, worthy of its legendary status, and a legit contender for the title of the greatest horror film of all time.

                                               
Leatherface, "A frustrated dancer in a doomed ballet."



You can read the rest of  Paul Counelis' book THE GREATEST HORROR MOVIE EVER MADE, available now at Lulu.com, Amazon.com or Barnes & Noble

Friday, June 26, 2015

THE GHOUL CAST EPISODE 13: SLASHER FILMS! What's the best? Which is the most important? FIND OUT HERE!

THE GHOUL CAST logo by Loren Gillespie III



LISTEN: THE GHOUL CAST SLASHERS EPISODE!

The Ghoul Cast is a biweekly podcast from industry insiders CHRIS RINGLER (Author, CEMETERY EARTH), PAUL COUNELIS (Rue Morgue columnist) and LUCIFER FULCI (Musician, SAMHAIN). Give a listen, see what ya think!

Saturday, January 10, 2015

Happy New Year! GHOUL CAST debuts with the top horror films of 2014!

Ghoul Cast Episode 1 - Flint Horror Con

Horror author Chris Ringler, Horror musician/author Lucifer Fulci, and Rue Morgue columnist/author Paul Counelis, members of the FLINT HORROR COLLECTIVE, have a high spirited and entertaining discussion about the best horror films of 2014! Plus, a quick look at a few of the most horrifying non-horror flicks and a sure to be controversial take on the films of horror auteur Rob Zombie!

Saturday, November 22, 2014

TOP FIVE HORROR FILMS OF THE EIGHTIES




Most lists focusing on the best horror films of an entire decade are going to be different than the next. There will be various reasons for why one movie makes one list, but not another. This list attempts to corral the top five horror films of the eighties based on this short, slightly unfocused sequence of criteria:
  • Popularity
  • Influence
  • Creative impact
  • Eighties representation
Some movies would score high in one category, but not as well in the others. A few of those films on the "just missed" list are Stan Winston's wonderful Pumpkinhead, Clive Barker's creepy Hellraiser, Tobe Hooper's Poltergeist, Fright Night, The Lost Boys, and Fred Dekker's awesome Night of the Creeps. There are cult favorites not included on the list, not because they're not good films, but because there is only room for five. Number six would probably be An American Werewolf in London, for instance.
So, without further ado...

5) Return of the Living Dead - Director Dan O'Bannon's cult magnum opus, about zombies who overrun a town. This movie kind of defines the decade in terms of splatter, effects, and the combination of horror and comedy so prevalent at that time. Embodies the "feel" of an eighties film.

4) The Shining - OK, so Stephen King wasn't madly in love with Stanley Kubrick's vision of King's book. Still, it stands the test of time, with Uncle Jack Nicholson's eerie turn, strange and unique visuals, and a style that would be copied relentlessly to much less success over the next twenty years. Recently released to Blu-ray.

3) The Evil Dead - Sam Raimi's low budget splatter-piece that introduced genre fans to fanboy hero Bruce Campbell. Campbell, as Ash, is lasciviously abused onscreen by undead creatures, some of whom used to be his friends. Strange, unique, and extremely influential film.

2) A Nightmare On Elm Street - Wes Craven's most iconic creation, and one of horrordom's most beloved characters, Freddy Krueger makes his debut in this dark, scary flick. Robert Englund snarls and slinks his way to a fan favorite performance, and the phenomena of Freddy is born. Creepy and effective to this day.

1) John Carpenter's The Thing - The master's best film of the eighties also doubles as one of the most popular, often cited as the best horror film of all time. Rob Bottin's mind blowing effects and the nightmarish setting make this one of the most memorable horror movies ever made. The "Norris Creature" is one of the most popular monsters of the decade, despite the limited screen time. Originally bombed at the box office amidst height of the feelgood gigantic hit E.T., but found renewed life on home video. If you haven't seen this film...well, what are you waiting for?

Monday, November 17, 2014

THE BEST HORROR FILM EVER MADE: The Case For John Carpenter's Halloween



It's an ongoing debate in the horror and cinematic community, and will never really be answered: what is the best horror film ever made? I have five in mind that I feel vie almost equally for the title, and here is one of them. Making the case for John Carpenter's 1978 classic...Halloween.

Sheriff Brackett: Every kid in Haddonfield thinks this place is haunted.
Dr. Loomis
: They may be right.

 
Someone once said that opinions are like belly buttons: everyone has one (well, except for Kyle XY, but that's a completely different story). Fans of horror cinema are no exception, and in many cases are actually extremely passionate about their fright flicks, often to the point of believing that their personal favorite is THE one...the best...the greatest horror film ever made.
To this notion, here is the argument for John Carpenter's seminal 1978 indie slasher Halloween.

The Source of Halloween

The onus for what eventually became John Carpenter's first masterwork began in the mind of film producer Irwin Yablans, who sought to make a movie that might have an Exorcist type impact on the film-going community. His basic idea was for a deranged psycho to stalk babysitters on Halloween night. Carpenter and Debra Hill wrote a screenplay based around the simple idea, Carpenter was given a $320,000 budget, and a new horror legend, Michael Myers, was born.

What would separate this character and this film from the other offerings of previous decades? For one, the sheer brilliance of Carpenter as a filmmaker, despite his lack of experience and with a budget that allowed little to no funds for such basic necessities as wardrobe. Carpenter made exceptional use of the first person camera, placing the audience in the role of the mad man and forcing those watching to do so from Myers' point of view.

The Crux of Halloween

At the base of this extraordinary film is the performance of young Jamie Lee Curtis, daughter of Janet Leigh (Psycho) and legendary actor Tony Curtis. Curtis portrays Laurie Strode as a believable character, and is unique in the annals of horror history in that she is actually likable and is an easy protagonist to root for. This shouldn't be underestimated in the underlying success of the film, because when you care about what happens to a character, it's much easier to build the tension.

Also notable is the great Donald Pleasence as the strange and often unhinged Dr. Loomis. He somehow manages to simultaneously add both weight and brief levity to the film, delivering wonderful lines with great passion. He seems to be enjoying himself in the part, and it's infectious.

In fact, one of the most successful scenes in the movie was dictated by Pleasence, according to Carpenter. With Carpenter's blessing, Pleasence made the decision to play the climactic scenario of Myers apparently absorbing bullets, falling out a window and disappearing into the night as ultimately unsurprising to Loomis. It's subtle but chilling...Was that the Bogeyman? As a matter of fact...it was.

Of course, Myers himself is also a huge reason for the film's success. He seems to be omnipresent, appearing in the shadows; standing outside Laurie's room; looking out the window of the old Myers residence. It's a cold take on evil itself, illustrated in the words of Doc Loomis: The blackest eyes...the devil's eyes.


Carpenter and cinematographer Dean Cundey's use of camera and lighting keep things on the creepy side throughout. A particularly inspired (and oft-copied) scene is one where Michael appears from the darkness of a doorway behind a frightened Laurie. It's sheer blackness, and the bluish-white mask subtly comes into view via the simple effect of a room dimmer. It's an extraordinary shot, and just one of many inspired moments in this excellent horror opus.

Also worth noting is Carpenter's spooky and memorable soundtrack. So integral to the success of the film, in fact, that early screenings of the film without the soundtrack were deemed not scary at all. The main theme is exceptionally unusual, with its driving, 5/4 time pulse, echoing The Exorcist's "Tubular Bells." To this day, all around the world, that theme music is identified with the very holiday of Halloween.

The Influence of Halloween 

The film as an influential work is undeniably strong, which is another requirement of any film vying for the title of the very best. Decades later, lesser films copy the main structures, characters and events of the film. The most successful of those types of movies is probably Friday the 13th, a series of films based around the Myers-esque Jason Voorhees, another silent stalker.
Notable are Rob Zombie's "re-imaginings" of the Halloween series with his films Halloween and the much more vilified sequel, Halloween II.

Still, the success of those remakes and the public's interest in the Myers character more than thirty years after John Carpenter's masterpiece was released is yet another reason to give a closer look to the original film as one of, if not THE, greatest horror film of all time.


What do YOU think?